Loading...
Optional analytics
Help us understand which pages are useful. Analytics stays off unless you accept. Essential sign-in and checkout cookies are unaffected.
Loading...
Fake, forged, composited, and illegally traded fossils are a serious problem. This guide helps you identify common fraud patterns before bidding.
Evidence before confidence: Jurassic Depot publishes disclosure standards and can flag missing or inconsistent information. A platform score is not authentication, lawful-title verification, or a substitute for independent examination.
Casts are replicas from real fossil molds. Look for: bubble marks, seam lines, uniform color, no natural variation, unnaturally perfect symmetry.
Multiple specimens glued together. Common in trilobites, dinosaur skeletons. Look for: color mismatches, unnatural joint lines, different preservation quality, glue residue under UV.
Undisclosed crack repair, fill, or reconstruction can materially change a listing. UV and raking-light images may reveal differences, but interpretation depends on the minerals and preparation materials. Ask for a preparation map and written restoration disclosure.
Paint or stain can hide repairs or create detail. Compare multiple lighting conditions and request preparation history. Do not apply solvents without material-specific conservation guidance.
A COA records a representation; it is not automatically proof. Cross-check issuer identity, dates, locality, permit numbers, signatures, and the chain connecting each document to the specimen.
Mongolian and Chinese paleontological material can be subject to state-ownership and movement controls. Use the applicable primary law and item-level government records; do not decide legality from a country label alone.
Commercial fossils from any region can contain multiple specimens, filler, paint, or reconstruction. Request a preparation map and independent examination when the price or scientific claim justifies it; Jurassic Depot has no representative dataset proving a country-wide fake rate.
These sources support legal-risk and consumer-evidence principles. They do not authenticate a specimen or prove that a particular seller committed fraud.
Editorial review: August 1, 2026. Evidence checklist only; not authentication, appraisal, fraud adjudication, or legal advice.